Note:

For an enlarged, easier to read index click here . To "google search" this site, scroll to the bottom of this page. (This site is best viewed with "Firefox")

(Tips: F11 key enables full screen viewing & Ctrl-F to search the index)

Showing posts with label BECHIRAH. Show all posts
Showing posts with label BECHIRAH. Show all posts

1.10.2007

BECHIRAH-----free will

qwert Posted - 05 October 2000 22:10


Everyone tells us that we have full Bechirah, but do we really?

First off why is hashem giving us choices in which we can’t see the full picture so we don’t always understand the choice.

Like if someone were to buy me two presents and they put each one wrapped up so I picked the bigger one cuz bigger always seems better but really it ended up that the smaller thing was what I always wanted, but too late I already opened it.

And also who said I chose to be a Jew? To be born into my family? When was this? I don’t remember any of it.

Being a Jew is so much harder than being a goy, all I havta do is keep sheva mitzvos bnei noach which are quite logical and I’m a clean man, not like a Jew that opening my eye there are like 80 things prob wrong with that.

So who said I have a choice?

MODERATOR Posted - 10 October 2000 17:38


Bechirah means not only the ability to do the right thing over the wrong thing, but the ability to choose right because it is right.

If we would be able to see the full picture, a cheeseburger would look like some kind of poison which if you eat will cause you excruciating pain, stolen money would look white hot such that if you touch it, it will incinerate your hand, and a Mitzvah would look more desirable than a ten million dollar bill.

The choice between doing a mitzvah or an Aveirah would be the same as The Lady Or The Tiger, but you would know behind which door lurks the tiger.

Not much of a choice.

So if you would have the real picture, you would then really not have Bechirah, because although you would have the ability to choose, only an idiot would choose scorching fire over eternal pleasure.

In such a case, your choosing the Mitzvah would not show that you are willing to choose right over wrong, but only that you would rather choose pleasure over pain.

Evil people would choose right over wrong in equal measure with righteous people.

You would not get any credit for choosing the Mitzvah that way.

That's not the type of Bechirah Hashem wanted us to have.

Bechirah means the ability to choose right from wrong because it is right. Because you care about choosing right. because you value what's right.

So what Hashem did was to give you the two options, the lady and the tiger, and you know which is which, but in order to ensure that you choose the lady because of what she is rather than for obvious reasons, Hashem makes the tiger not so scary and the lady not so appealing.

At least not in this world.

It's to balance your Bechirah to make sure you choose right from wrong, not pleasure from pain.

It's like the story of a guy, Frank we'll call him, who meets a girl online, and, after a number of emails and IM's he is impressed with her personality and the finally decide to meet, the next day, in Penn Station. "How will I know who you are?" he asked.

"I'll be wearing a white rose," she said.

Well, the guy arrived, he looked around, and there was an elderly, diminutive lady, with white hair, wearing a white rose. He sighed, he put his chin up, he walked over, smiled and said: "Hi. I'm Frank. May I take you to dinner?"

As he looked at her, she said: "Young man. I don't exactly know what this is all about. But I was told that if you came up and asked me to dinner that I should point you over to that lady over yonder."

And there was the most bedazzling girl-of-his-dreams, who became his blushing bride and the mother of his children.

Similarly Hashem hides the "real picture" because wants to make sure we choose the Mitzvos for the right reasons. So he makes Mitzvos appear in this world not the way they really are.

But whereas Frank believed that his girl was old and undesirable, Hashem, in His benevolence, allows us to know, intellectually, that the Mitzvah is most dazzling piece of beauty that we can imagine.


Me Posted - 10 October 2000 17:50


qwert we are only given nisyonos we can handle which means you were born to be a Jew b/c that's what your neshama wants and yearns for and you'll be able to be a great Jew if you try your hardest and you know life's tough s/t and we just got to learn and grow from that and not sink lower.

MODERATOR Posted - 10 October 2000 18:07


Re: Being Jewish

Any situation you find yourself in not by your own choice was created by Hashem, and given to you because it is the best possible situation for you.

Not necessarily the least painful or the most fun today, but definitely the best for you in the long run. In other words, if you would understand everything about it, you, too, would have chosen what Hashem gave you. it's just that you can't see the whole picture, since you're not Hashem, that it looks less than the best.

The reason it pays to be a Jew even though there are many more responsibilities is asked by the Meforshim on the Chazal that says "Hashem wanted to give His people more reward so He gave them many Mitzvos". they ask, yes, more reward, but also more potential for punishment. So why is more responsibilities, more Torah and Mitzvos, a good thing?

(You ask good questions, qwert)

The Shem MiShmuel (Bamidbar, Shavuos) explains that the question is based on a fallacy.

The question assumes that the measure of reward for a Mitzvah and the punishment for an Aveirah are proportionate. That is a not so. The reward for fulfilling a Mitzvah is so great, much greater than the punishment for doing an Aveirah, such that it is worth even going through the punishment of many Aveiros to get it.

So therefore, it is better for us if we have more responsibilities, i.e. more Mitzvos, because even if it means we have more chance to slip up, as long as we have more opportunities to do Mitzvos, we are very very ahead of the game.

But that is only regarding the multitude of Mitzvos we have as a Jew. If the question is why be a Jew as opposed to a goy, the answer is simply, that through the seven Mitzvos you don't get Olam Habbah, you don't connect to Hashem.

Although non-Jews do get rewarded for their Mitzvos, their reward is in a totally different league than the ultimate, eternal, unending, beyond-imagining reward of the Jew.

Remember, to connect to hashem, to share the Perfect Pleasure that he has, there is no way except through fulfilling the Torah. (Please see the "Basic Judaism" forum for details.)


Renée Posted - 11 October 2000 15:13


Out of curiosity, what reward do the goyim get for obeying the Noachide laws?

MODERATOR Posted - 11 October 2000 16:08


They get reward after they die, some type of Olam Habah, though not like Jews. And there are those who say that they receive some subservient role after Moshiach comes.


qwert Posted - 13 October 2000 14:20


I understand what your saying about choice how we don’t really chose if we know everything, but why does hashem want us to chose. he can look down at the world so much happier seeing ppl doing the right thing because they know and see what’s right and then of course there are those ppl that can know the truth and still rebel.

So let the rebels rebel cuz that’s what they want and let the ppl that try but cant fully see everything fully see everything, and if they wanna do the right thing they’re doing it with a full heart. and some ppl see more of the picture than others, like whoever is answering my stupid questions understands 80 times more than I do, how come Hashem made me ask questions and not give answers?

MODERATOR Posted - 23 October 2000 18:14


Doing Mitzvos are not only for Hashem to see what we will do. You are correct - that he knows already. Rather, they are for US to become holy through doing them. Each Mitzvah affects us in a positive way.

Hashem made everybody according to the way he saw fit, according to the best way possible for that person. Our job in this world is to become Tzadikim. Period.

If we become Tzadikim who ask question, or give answers, or a little of both, or neither, that's up to Hashem. But all of the above can become equally great, meaning, equally righteous.


yideleh Posted - 24 May 2002 16:09


Just a question I was thinking about:

If we really do have Bechirah, then how come we didn't have Bechirah (the ability to make the choice) to be in our present situation? (I mean, to be born and have to go thru life to begin with?)


MODERATOR Posted - 24 May 2002 16:37


Because you only have Bechirah to choose Mitzvos and aveiros. All other choices you make - i.e. any that are irrelevant to the Torah - are not made through Bechirah, but rather are determined by Hashem.

Your being born is not a "right or wrong" decision on your part and therefore not in the realm of your Bechirah. Rather, Hashem does what is best for you. If He decides its best for you to be born, you will be. If not, not.


yideleh Posted - 28 May 2002 2:08


If you only have Bechirah when it comes to mitzvos and aveiros, then how does the rest of life's choices work?

If I decided to wear my hair in a pony, or to let it loose, I didn't exercise my Bechirah?


MODERATOR Posted - 28 May 2002 2:55


Right. If there is no Tznius issue involved in that decision, for instance, its not your Bechirah but Hashem putting that decision into your head.


Taryag Posted - 29 May 2002 4:09


For such an example, how can the answer be so clear cut?

There are those that hold that all hair must be tied back, regardless of the length, while others let even long hair down, as long as it isn't too seductive.

With all the different shitos, how can it be Bechirah for one person and yad Hashem in the other?


ponder2 Posted - 29 May 2002 18:09


What about doing hishtadlus for s/t...Hashem also puts the ideas of what to do in your head?

That's not necessarily right or wrong either.


MODERATOR Posted - 29 May 2002 18:28


Taryag,

The decision to follow one shita or another is also a Bechirah decision. You choose who to follow. Even if its your Rebbi or family's shita, you choose to adhere to it. You also choose whether to take the more stringent approach, even if it is not the one you were taught is obligatory.


Ponder,

The amount of Hishtadlus you put in is certainly a "Yisras Shamayim" decision. It is directly related to the amount of Bitachon you have, and to "ain somchin al haness".

The rule is this: If this decision would be made differently by Moshe Rabbeinu than by a Rasha, it is a Yiras Shamayim decision and Bechirah plays a role. If Moshe Rabbeinu and the Rasha have no reason to make different decisions (like whether to paint the wall green or blue) then it is a non-Bechirah decision.


yideleh Posted - 02 June 2002 19:04


Are you serious? Cuz what you're saying means that I'm not really in control of everything I do in my life at all! I'm a bit confused...


yideleh Posted - 02 June 2002 19:04


Even painting walls can have Bechirah involved in it I think. For example, a shrink might paint his walls dull colors so as to have a "calming" environment to offer his clients. A kid place will want to paint their walls in bright colors to attract attention.

Are you saying that such a decision (which is based on thoughts and reasons) doesn't involve Bechirah?

Besides, practically everything in life is based on thought processing. Which means there will be a few choices, and you gotta choose something. How could there be no Bechirah?

Even if you choose something just cuz you don't know what to choose and have to choose something (like going to a restaurant and having to choose something off a menu, but not knowing what, so you just choose anything....) how can you say that wasn't Bechirah? You still exercised your free will to make the choice. No one forced you!


MODERATOR Posted - 02 June 2002 19:58


It seems to you like you have Bechirah, but that doesn’t mean its so. You know those stories about robots who think they’re human only to discover they’re not, and they’re decisions were all programming? Its like that.

The wall case may of may not be so, it boils down simply to the question of whether there is any Yiras Shamayim involved in your decision. If so, then it is a Bechirah decision. If not, not.

On the contrary, Bechirah is a miracle. Logic and the laws of physics demand that Bechirah should not exist. I discussed this elsewhere. Check it out: http://www.frumteens.com/

topic.php?topic_id=158&forum_id=31&Topic_

Title=If+Hashem+knows

+what+we+will+choose+

.+.+.&forum_title=Bechirah

See my post of 10/16


awaysrite Posted - 24 September 2002 20:16


Hey Mod - I'm doing a report on Bechirah and I happened to chance on this forum.

I was wondering if you could help me out a little, like I have no clue where to start... It would be helpful if you could tell me of sfarim etc (doesn't need to be English - if it helps) , that I can use, sources in Tanach and Gemara would be helpful. If you don't mind email me..... thanx a bunch


MODERATOR Posted - 24 September 2002 20:21


There is a 30 volume encyclopedia on topics of Hashkafa and Agada called "Aspaklaria", written by a Dr. Adler from Zurich, Switzerland.

If you use the entry on "Bechirah" there, you will find all the sources you need.

Otherwise, Rav Dessler in Michtav M'Eliyahu has a chapter called "Kuntres Habechirah".

If you want something advanced and exotic, the Ohr Sameach has several pages on the issue of Bechirah vs. Hashem's foreknowledge in his commentary on the Rambam Hilchos Teshuva.


firefly Posted - 26 September 2002 7:00


The mod mentioned kuntrus ha Bechirah- we spent a lot of time on it in seminary. It's incredible- recommended reading for everyone esp. if you have any questions in Bechirah. (If you learn it w/someone who's well versed in r' dessler, it's even more powerful)


shmatta Posted - 05 November 2002 8:06


Earlier on you were saying something abt. going according to your family. let's say your family davens ashkenaz and you want to change to sfard or they keep cholov yisrael but you don't want to. it's not an aveira right??


MODERATOR Posted - 05 November 2002 10:56


It is. You must follow the Minhagim of your home.

And cholov yisroel is not a "minhag". It is a halachah.

This was discussed in the Halachah / Cholov Yisroel section. Please refer.


Admonit Posted - 13 November 2003 21:29


Hi

Someone asked me this and I know the answer, but I could not give the person an answer that I felt was satisfactory one hundred percent to that person.

A person is formed by various nature/nurture things that are not in his hands, he doesn’t decide his chinuch or personality etc.

So when he makes a choice whether or not to murder someone , all the things that let up to that choice were not in his hands.

So what makes one person choose yes to kill and another choose not to kill? Obviously his whole life experiences and divinely given brain/personality etc . otherwise why does one person choose yes and one no? why does one have the strength and one doesn’t feel like it?

Obviously I am giving an extreme example , put there davening in the morning or speaking lashon hara. whatever.

So one person chooses yes and one no. why do they have choice?

It seems like they are choosing based on WHO TEHY ARE. not because of Bechirah. How can I prove that its Bechirah that ppl can choose???

If you are going to answer because then they make the choice at that point , its not the answer. Bec what makes them make the choice at that point.

Is this something that can be proven to someone who is not interested in recognizing anything else in Torah?

Please answer even for myself to have it clear. thank you


MODERATOR Posted - 13 November 2003 22:10


Your question actually serves to illustrate what Bechirah is rather than question it.

You are correct form a physical, scientific point of view - Bechirah is not possible. This is because of the Law of Causation, which says that every effect has a cause. And identical causes invariably lead to identical effects.

In other words, if two people throw the dice in the exact same way under the exact same circumstances, with no difference at all in the throwing conditions, both sets of dice will have to land on the same numbers.

And since every effect has a cause, that is, everything has to have a reason it happened, if you choose to get out of bed in the morning, your choice, too, had to have a cause. There had to be a reason you made choice A over choice B.

And the reason for your choice also had to have a reason, on and on into infinity.

According to physics, and intuition, and logic, you cannot have a "first cause" (that is, something that happened without any cause). Everything had to have a cause.

This is one of the classic proofs to Hashem's existence: Since every effect had to have a cause, and the cause had to have its own cause, there had to have been an infinite number of causes stretching back into the past. However, since infinity can never be reached, the amount of causes that already happened in the past cannot be infinity.

Therefore the amount of causes has to be finite. But if so, then there had to be a first cause that existed for no cause or no reason. (This is explained at length in several other places on the site - do a search on frumteens for "Zeno" and you'll find the long version of it).

Only Hashem can be a First Cause. Because anything in the physical world has to have a reason.

And so, Bechirah cannot exist according to nature. Because there had to be a REASON why you chose one way over the other.

If you were to have two people, with the exact same set of causes - two identical clones with the same upbringing, circumstances, everything - can one of them wake up in the morning and choose to get out of bed while the other one will stay under the covers?

No, you cant. Since there has to be something that CAUSED the different choices, but if the circumstances are identical, the results have to be, too.

So how can we indeed have Bechirah?

The answer is, this is why the Meforshim say that "Tzelem Elokim" means Bechirah. In order to facilitate free will, Hashem had to instill within us a "piece" of Himself kivyachol, such that we humans now also have the ability to be a First Cause, just like Hashem!

ONLY Hashem can be a First Cause, but now, humans were given that ability as well! That is the simple pshat in Tzelem Elokim.

We were miraculously given the ability to choose for no other reason that we decided to choose. That’s where the chain of causes ends - with our decision.

Circumstance, nature, nurture et all can only cause nisyonos - temptations. But they do not affect our Bechirah. Our Bechirah is causeless, like Hashem is. What we decide to do, we do. And why did we decide? Because we have the ability to decide, not because some cause determined our decision.

What you should do is ask this Q to an atheist. They have this problem - no way to explain free will. This is why society, as it becomes more and more science-oriented, is also becoming more and more entrenched in the belief that criminal behavior is excusable on the grounds that it was caused by the criminal's nature and nurture. They really don’t want to come out and admit it, but they have no choice but to live with the inescapable fact that without Hashem's giving us the ability to be a First Cause, we are nothing but robots, resigned to nature's whims. Our choices were CAUSED by something.

But we who know the truth understand that we were granted the greatest power and privilege possible - even greater than what is possible according to nature - the power to choose.

Only we and Hashem can do that. Everything else has to have reasons.


Admonit Posted - 15 November 2003 17:59


Cool! thank u!

You answered me, but you wont answer him because he doesn’t want to know that there is choice or G-d.

But you answered me. thanks a lot.


dina17 Posted - 17 November 2003 19:58


If we would have Bechirah chufshit so we would all start from the same point and you see tons of people one is frum the other is not!!! What’s going on???

MODERATOR Posted - 17 November 2003 20:14


That’s exactly what Bechirah is. YOU decide where you will go.


who me?! Posted - 18 November 2003 3:09


Mod wow!! thanks for sharing big time!!

I was never fully clear on this I hope now I am at least till I read this again.

I usually put this q in the back of my mind so as not to let it interfere with my everyday life. thank you


yossele Posted - 30 January 2004 7:08


BTW rav mod recent developments in physics (chaos theory) imply that Bechirah is not only not scientifically impossible but very plausible

MODERATOR Posted - 30 January 2004 7:21


No, it doesn’t. Not at all. I have no idea where you got that from.

Chaos theory merely means that there is a "sensitive dependency on initial conditions" that is not measurable, which skews the accuracy of predictions. In other words, the "chaos" is the effect of causes that we are not aware of, but there certainly has to be causes.

Bechirah is a choice based not on any cause, but on itself. Thee is no such thing that something happens without a reason.


smileYJ Posted - 06 February 2004 8:31


Mod, this is abt your post on 13th November- sorry I only just read it now.

I don’t really understand how your post answers the question.

You wrote that " we decide because we have the ability to decide, not because some cause determined our decision", but that doesn’t seem to make sense because then why would we choose one option over another.

If there is no cause then surely it is a random decision? - which is not Bechirah.

The only way I can understand it is if your saying that Hashem gave us this miraculous possibility of Bechirah called 'tzelem elokim' which is inconceivable to humans due to our human limitations and we cant understand how it can work but we just have to have Emunah that it exists.

Is this right or did I misunderstand you completely?


MODERATOR Posted
- 06 February 2004 8:39


That’s exactly the point. Bechirah is a miracle. Any "first cause" is a miracle, and more than a miracle. Only Hashem can be a First Cause.

In the case of Bechirah, it is Hashem that gave us the ability, so we're obviously not Hashem or comparable to Him, but the idea that we can choose one way or another without any cause, is a power that cannot exist according to science and nature.

The Tzelem Elokim means, then, that we have a power that is so miraculous that it reflects the power that is possessed only by Hashem.



Elchonon Posted - 06 February 2004 13:48


Wow! Thanks Mod!


NJB18 Posted - 20 January 2005 7:43
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I think some of the questions about determinism were not completely answered.

Determinism is actually quite a tricky theory to explain so I will attempt to do so briefly:

Any action or thought can be easily explained or its origins can be seen from environmental influence, genetics, or the mixing and matching of the two. Anything. For example, if I decide not to go to shul one Shabbos morning, maybe it could be traced to a bad Jewish experience, or maybe just lethargy.

Any action or thought can be traced to some tangible (not G-dly or spiritual) attribute - I do not see why one should believe one any more than the other. And if one says that it is the neshama and the ruach etc. how does one explain, “environmental influence, genetics, or the mixing and matching of the two”???

These questions have always bothered me. Any answers?

Also, moderator, you told a story about a man named Frank who found the girl of his dreams on the internet, this is actually a real short story written by S.I. Kishor, titled "APPOINTMENT WITH LOVE" - just to give credit where credit is due - also, you said that there is no such thing as an infinite past, why not? Please bring some proof.


MODERATOR Posted - 20 January 2005 7:51
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determinism: The question is more sever than you are making it. Every effect must have a cause, and so if you decide to get out of bed in the morning there must be a reason you decided that; and then a reason for the reason, and so on. This being the case, free will would be impossible, since equal causes must result in equal effects, but free will say that causes do not determine your decisions - your Bechirah does.

I answered this. The answer is that Hashem is the First Cause that had no cause (please see the "G-d" forum), and He put a chelek elokah mimaal inside us, i.e. the Neshoma, which facilitates Bechirah. In other words, He has given us the miraculous ability to be a First Cause, ability that only He can have al pi derech hatevah. Bad experiences and stuff like that are nisyonos, but Bechirah can overcome them.

Re Infinity: Please see the "G-d" forum where this is discussed at length. In short, infinity can never be reached. That’s the definition of infinite - having no end.

Therefore, if something has an end, is quantified, or has been reached, it cannot be infinity. Since the past has already ended, then the past obviously is not infinite. That’s the nutshell version. Again, for proofs (more like simple logic) see the "G-d" forum.

Re the story - never said it was original. It's pretty well known and I assumed the readers would know that, regardless of who the particular author was.

I never meant to imply that the story was original.

1.09.2007

BECHIRAH-----ohr hachaim vs sefer hachinuch

MODERATOR'S NOTE: The following is a reprint of a question in the Life / Other / Lubavitch forum.

It refers to the Sefer HaChinuch on the Mitzvah of Lo Sikom - you may not take revenge - where he says that since any damage anyone does to you is anyway decreed by Hashem, so why would you want to take revenge on the person, since whatever he did to you was supposed to happen anyway.

A similar statement is found in the Chovos Halevovos.


Q1 Posted - 01 January 2001 17:24


___________________________________________

If nobody disagrees w/ the sefer HaChinuch and Ibn Ezra you mentioned above how would you explain the Ohr Hachaim in Breishis 37:21?

My understanding was that he was arguing with this idea.


MODERATOR Posted - 02 January 2001 21:14


First let’s tell everyone what you’re talking about.

In Parshas Vayeshev, when Reuven saves Yosef from his brothers who wanted to kill him by lowering him into the pit, the Ohr HaChaim Hakodosh asks what kind of salvation was the pit – it was full of deadly snakes and scorpions, so lowering Yosef into there meant certain death anyway.

He answers that snakes and scorpions only kill someone when Hashem tells them to, so if Yosef is lowered into the pit he will only die if it is G-d’s will, and since Yosef was a total Tzadik, Reuven knew that is would live. But if would be left to the mercies of his brothers, he could be killed even against G-d’s will, since humans are baalei Bechirah and they can kill even against the will of G-d.

Q1’s question is, this seems to be at odds with the Sefer HaChinuch which says there is no reason for a person to want revenge against anyone, since whatever the other person did to you was anyway decreed by G-d.

It’s a good question. A lot of people think that the Ohr HaChaim argues with the Sefer HaChinuch. But it doesn’t have to be so.

First, the Chofetz Chaim (al HaTorah Mishpatim) proves from the Gemora that even if someone hurts you, it is still Min HaShamayim.

The Gemora is talking about the fact that the Torah gives a doctor permission to heal. “V rapoh yerapeh” the posuk says. Explains the Gemora; You might have thought that since G-d decreed a person be ill, it would be forbidden to heal him since you are contradicting Hashem’s decree.

But, the Chofetz Chaim points out, the posuk of verapoh yerapeh is referring in context to a person who is injured by being hit by another person.

You therefore see, says the Chofetz Chaim, that even when one person hits another person it is a divine decree.

The Chovos HaLevovos also mentions that when one person harms another it can only be by divine decree.

Rav Chaim Volozhen (Ruach Chaim) also explains along these lines the Mishna in Pirkei Avos, “He saw a skull floating on the water. He said to it: Because you killed someone were you killed – and the person who killed you will be killed nonetheless”.

On the other hand, the Ohr HaChaim who says that a person can harm another even against the will of Hashem and that’s why Reuven was helping Yosef by lowering him into the pit, is really a Zohar, on the spot. The Ohr HaChaim does not quote it, but it’s there.

The Metzudas Dovid in Daniel (3:26) similarly asks why Channia Mishael and Azaryah didn’t simply jump out of the fiery furnace when they had a chance. Even though they would have had to fight Nevuchadnetzar, still, by staying the fire they were as good as dead anyway so why not chance jumping out and fighting? He says that the fire is not a Baal Bechirah and only burns when Hashem decrees. Nevuchadnetzar, on the other hand, is a Baal Bechirah and could kill them even against Hashem’s wishes. The same idea as the Zohar and the Ohr HaChaim.

There are numerous other sources with this idea as well, particularly in the Chassidishe Seforim.

There doesn’t have to be any disagreement. For sure, Hashem can, and sometimes does protect people even from Baalei Bechirah, like when Moshe Rabbeinu’s neck turned to stone. Or on Chanukah, Rabim b’Yad m’atim.

So here’s the question: If Hashem decides to protect Yosef form the brothers Yosef will be protected; if he decides to let the brothers kill him, he will die. So what’s that different than the snakes and scorpions?

The answer is that Hashem’s decision to protect or not protect people is not random, but follows certain rules. Hashem takes into consideration the person’s merits, zechus avos, other zechusim, and various different factors then decides what to do.

At times, there are circumstances that upset the balance. Like for instance a Makom Sakanah, where Hashem will not afford a person his otherwise warranted level of protection.

Or the Halachah that prohibits us to walk on a bridge together with a Rasha. If Hashem decides to punish the Rasha, by collapsing the bridge, we will c”v be in danger.

But let’s try to understand this. If Hashem wants to innocent person to live he will live; if he wants him to die he will die, so why should the fate of the Rasha accidentally affect the life of the Tzadik because he was in the wrong place at the wrong time?

The answer is of course Hashem can save him, but just like there is such a thing as a natural Makom Sakanha where there is a specially strict system of life and death, so too there are situations, such as being on a bridge with a Rasha, that are similarly dangerous such that Hashem uses a more strict system to determine whether a person lives or dies.

So no matter what, a person’s fate is in the hands of Hashem. It’s just that there are certain circumstances that even if a person would normally be given life, under those circumstances, his Zechusim would not be enough to save him.

So it’s the same thing with Baalei Bechirah vs. non-Baalei Bechirah. The system Hashem uses to determine life and death based on a person’s merits was designed for non-Baalei Bechirah situations. When a Baal Bechirah is involved, it’s like being on a bridge with a Rasha, or a simple Makom Sakanah and the usual system of what kind of zechusim you need to live is no longer applicable. Of course Hashem can save you, but it’s harder to be saved from baalei Bechirah just like it’s harder to be allowed to live when walking in a makom Sakanah.

So there need not be a Machlokes here. The Ohr HaChaim, the Zohar, the Metzudas, and all the other seforim that say a Baal Bechirah can over ride Hashem’s plan only need to mean that they can invalidate Hashem’s usual method of running the world the way a Makom Sakanah can. So it’s true that a Baal Bechirah can kill someone even if he doesn’t deserve to be killed, the same way that walking on a bridge can kill someone who otherwise would not deserve to be killed. But just as the collapsed bridge and the death of all who are on it is totally Hashem’s doing, so too death at the hands of a Baal Bechirah is totally Hashem’s doing. You would need a greater level of zechusim, even greater than what you would normally need for a miracle, to be saved from a Baal Bechirah. And your usual zechusim would not help. The usual manner of the way the world runs would not apply. Instead, there would be a stricter system.

So Reuven did help Yosef by putting him into the pit, because against snakes and scorpions, because Yosef’s zechusim as a perfect Tzadik would certainly spare him from snakes, but when dealing with baalei Bechirah, Hashem doesn’t necessarily save even someone with perfect zechusim; Chananiah Mishael and Azariah were smart for facing the fire instead of Nevuchadnetzar for the same reason.


Q1 Posted - 05 January 2001 15:33


What bothers me about your answer is that it seems to imply that when we are dealing with Baalei Bechirah that for Hashem’s Ratzon to be in effect completely you need all things being equal and this is never the case for e.g. we ride cars a dangerous activity so if you get hurt riding a car can we say this was not really hashems will because you distorted the balance, Or if someone hurts you or insults you its because you were near a disturbed person?

There are so many variables.

I also remember learning in Navi a while ago that Dovid (or Shlomo?) where someone was insulting him and he told his people not to punish him because this was what hashem wanted. In R Elchonon Wasserman's sefer (p54) where he wants to say that no matter what happens to you was decreed by hashem on RH you don’t even have the ability to commit suicide unless hashem decreed that you should die.

This I think certainly goes against the Ohr Hachaim.

When the Ibn Ezrah says we shouldn’t be jealous because other people are separate planets who we shouldn’t look at they have nothing to do with us because its impossible that we should have what they have and when the Chinuch says
revenge is wrong because this is what hashem wants according to your answer this shouldn’t be a sufficient reason because maybe the balance got messed up.

There also seems to be a contradiction in the OHR HACHAIM HAKODESH himself because in Breishis 44:16 by Binyomin being punished he brings the idea you did from Sanhedrin that tzadikim get taken down with the wicked but in 42:21 by Reuven he doesn’t say there is punishment by association which is why Yosef's brothers had to assume their sin was not listening to yosef's cries as opposed to their obvious greater sins which Reuven was not part of.

If you know of any seforim that mention the Ohr Hachaim's opinion at length I would be interested in seeing them.
Thanks.


HZ Posted - 07 January 2001 20:16


My understanding is that the Ohr Hachaim says that a baal Bechirah can kill somebody who is not chayev misah where as an animal cannot.

The person still only dies at Hashems will.

The question becomes then why the Ohr Hachaim says Reuvein saved Yosef's life. The moderator answered that. I just want to add: It seems he would have lived in any case for that was Hashem's will.

It’s just that now Reuvein saved him.

MODERATOR Posted - 07 January 2001 21:27


Q1,

Just a reminder, the Ohr HaChaim is merely duplicating the Zohar ad loc, so let's refer to this as the Zohar's opinion.

It's not a question of "upsetting the balance." It's a question of Hashem shifting His level of method of judgment from the mode that He usually uses to one that is more strict when Baalei Bechirah are involved.

Nobody questions the fact that when someone kills himself it is G-d that decided, allowed, and caused the person to be successful. Had G-d not wanted the guy to kill Himself, he wouldn’t have been able to, since he needed G-d's help to do it.

However, also, nobody disagrees that G-d dies not want this guy to kill himself, since He said Thou shalt not kill!

So which is it? Does G-d want this guy to be killed or not?

The answer is that for sure G-d would have preferred that this guy not kill Himself. In that sense we say G-d did not want this guy to kill Himself.

However, after the guy used his free will to decide to kill himself, G-d now willingly and proactively decrees that this guy's decision should become reality. Nobody forced G-d to do this. In this sense we say G-d wanted the guy to get killed. Its two different definitions of "want". Look at it this way:

G-d willingly makes this guy to kill himself now that the guy decided to do it. But G-d would have preferred that the guy not make that decision.

When we drive a car it is not considered a Sakanha since Shomer Pesayim Hashem, but if we jump off a roof, or drive wildly, then yes, we upset the balance and G-d now responds to our wildness by shifting His method of dealing in the world and now deals with you stricter.

The only thing that disturbs the balance is Bechirah. If a person is disturbed and cannot control his actions it is not a Bechirah decision.

Many Seforim talk about the Ohr HaChaim.

The Be'er Mayim Chaim in Chayei Sarah on the posuk V'ekod V'eshtachaveh explains with this principle that even though Hashem arranges shiduchim, a person with his Bechirah can reject his proper zivug.

The Divrei Yoel in Ekev explains with this principle that even Hashem does not give a person a Nisayon more than he can handle, however, a Baal Bechirah can, meaning that a Baal Bechirah who tries to influence you to do an aveirah may present you with a Nisayon stronger than that which Hashem would have given you, that is, a Nisayon too hard for you to handle. This is why it is so important to avoid bad influences, much more than other Nisyonos.

Rabbi Mattisyahu Solomon shlita, the mashgiach of Lakewood, in his Matnas Chaim (Vol. I, "Ais lischok") writes that it always bothered him that the Tur writes that Shabbos HaGodol is called by that name because the Jews miraculously got away with shechting the Egyptian god as a Korban Pesach). He asks, why is this miracle any more impressive than all the miracles that the Jews had in Egypt when they were spared from the Makos for instance?

According to this Zohar, Rabbi Solomon's questions disappears, since all the other miracles involved the Jews being saved from animals and other non-Baalei Bechirah. The fact that the Jews were saved from the Egyptians who were Baalei Bechirah is a much greater miracle.

I had an idea that this Zohar is the meaning of the posuk in Mishle (17:12) "Better to encounter a bear bereaved of its cubs than to meet a fool in his foolishness".

A fool is a Baal Bechirah, and can harm you worse than a crazy bear, who, no matter how bad a mood he is in, is not a Baal Bechirah and only listens to Hashem.

There are countless places where this Zohar and the Ohr Hachaim is discussed. If you are looking for a specific angle on it, let me know and I'll see if I can point you somewhere.


Q1 Posted - 07 January 2001 23:36


HZ,


Ohr Hachaim 44:17 writes the reason Yehuda approached (Vayegash) yosef when he demanded binyamin alone remain a slave is because he realized now that hashem was not punishing them for sins because Binyamin was not a part of them, rather, it was because yosef was a Baal Bechira and (like you said) able to do things that would punish them for things they were not punishable for from hashem. This is why yehuda got angry.

My point before was how are we to know if anything that happens to us should be happening to us or is it a "built in loophole" in what the Ratzon hashem is due to a baal Bechirah effecting it. Reuven and Yehuda were able to distinguish when it was because of din they were punished and when it was a baal Bechirah intervening.We are not.

Therefore my question was how can we be content with everything that happens a la Ibn Ezra and sefer HaChinuch if there are so many variables effecting it.

Therefore I don’t think they agree with Ohr Hachaim.


MODERATOR Posted - 07 January 2001 23:45


The ibn Ezra was talking about being jealous of a person's fortunes. That does not come through Bechirah but rather through Gezeirah. Only right vs. wrong comes through Bechirah.

The Sefer HaChinuch says that you should not be angry at someone for doing something to you because Hashem caused it. This is true even if the damage came through a Bechirah-loophole as you call it, since even in such a case, Hashem clearly acted to make the Bechirah-choice come true. if someone shoots someone else, even though it does not show the usual mode of Mishpat, but the point of the chinuch is, if Hashem allowed the gun to shoot, and the bullet to reach its target, etc. etc., why be angry at the shooter? Hashem Himself contributed to the shooting.

The Sefer HaChinuch was talking about whether you should be angry at someone; the Ohr Hachaim is talking about whether the normal indications of guilt and innocence are in effect.

The answer is no, the usual scales of guilt and innocence are not in effect, but you should still not be angry at the person, since Hashem did make him be successful.

In other words, if someone shoots someone else, the victim may not be as guilty as he normally would have to be in order to sustain such damage through a non-Baal Bechirah, but despite his not being so guilty, Hashem still was involved in his being shot.


MODERATOR Posted - 08 January 2001 18:55


The Zohar's opinion is also used extensively by Rav Yonason Eyebushitz ZT"L, a contemporary of the Ohr HaChaim, in Yaaros Devash (I:3, I:15, II:2).


jess Posted - 26 September 2004 0:01


You brought up the idea that there isn't any reason to take revenge on someone else, because whatever they've done to you was done because G-d decreed it to be.

My question is along the same lines-if G-d creates us to be exactly as we are, with the knowledge of all of the decisions we will make, then why should He punish us for those decisions?

For example, why would He declare that homosexuality is an abomination and then create people who will live their lives as homosexuals?

Also, if he creates someone who will murder others, then if my understanding is correct, his/her victims are meant to end their lives at that point as a part of G-d's plan, but why shouldn't they die of natural causes?

Why does G-d involve someone else who will have to pay for that action? I'm not saying that I think G-d should have created everyone flawless, because I understand the idea of making mistakes and then repenting for them, but situations like these I don't understand at all - where people are immoral and never repent, etc.

Please help, I've asked this question in various forms over the past couple months and it’s never been posted.


MODERATOR Posted - 26 September 2004 0:09


It hasn’t been posted because the answers are already to be found all over the site.

Look at the beginning of this forum. It discusses your assumption that:

“if he creates someone who will murder others, then if my understanding is correct, his/her victims are meant to end their lives at that point as a part of G-d's plan, but why shouldn't they die of natural causes? “

In short: G-d knows what we will choose, but the decisions are our free-will. It’s like Hashem looks into a crystal ball and sees the future. The fact that he knows what the person He is observing will do does not mean He made him do it.

G-d did not say being homosexual is wrong, He only said that committing acts of homosexuality is wrong. A person who is a homosexual has a very difficult Nisayon, but it is a Nisayon nonetheless, just like all temptation in the world. G-d creates temptation because by saying no to it, we merit Olam Habah. Having the temptation is not a bad thing - giving in to it is. A homosexual can be as big a Tzadik - bigger, even, since his nisyonos, in this area, at least, are greater - as Moshe Rabbeinu.

As far as the murder goes, as you see at the beginning of the forum, it is the opinion of many Torah authorities that if someone gets murdered it is not part of Hashem's plan.

But even according to those who say it is part of Hashem's plan, it doesn’t mean that Hashem involved the murderer. The murderer involved himself. The person would indeed have died of natural causes, but the murderer wanted to murder him and decided to murder him, and so the murderer did. That is why he gets punished - because he independently decided to commit the murder.

Yes, G-d knew he would decide this, but so what? That doesn’t make the murderer any less evil. The decision to murder and the attempt to murder someone is what makes someone evil - and this murderer did all that.


mo Posted - 18 September 2005 15:44


**For example, why would He declare that homosexuality is an abomination and then create people who will live their lives as homosexuals?**

I think r. MODERATOR shouldn't give in so easy : who says that homosexuals are "created" in the first place? It's just a piece of propaganda.


eliana Posted - 24 September 2005 21:24


Question:


I understand the concept that it's harder to be saved if you place yourself in a makom sakana, or you walk under a bridge with a rasha, because those things are things you know you should not be doing. If something happens to you, you have it coming to you, because you placed yourself in a situation where you know you will be judged in a stricter way.

But it seems different when Hashem changes the judgment to strict judgment because there is a baal Bechirah involved.

There, you didn't do anything to deserve to be judged more strictly, it's the other person who is causing the change in judgment. I don't understand how a person can be judged according to Midas hadin because of the actions of someone else. Or is it just something we have to accept as the way Hashem runs the world?


MODERATOR Posted - 24 September 2005 21:34


It's Hashems way of running the world.

BECHIRAH-----and istakel boraisa

LiLIsraeli Posted - 09 February 2006 14:30


K, based on this Zohar, "Istakel b'Oraysa u'vara alma" (and other things I've learned - on this site as well), Hashem first created the Torah, and based on what it says in the Torah, He then created the world.

So the actions of the people in the Torah were written about before they took place. For example, Adam's sin was in the Torah before it happened, and Avraham passed the ten nisyonos before they happened as well.

If their actions were decided before they did them, how can we say that they had Bechirah?

If Korach's sin was written about in the Torah, there was no way that Korach could have NOT sinned!

Then the entire Torah would have been proven false.

So how does this fit into the concept of bechirah?


MODERATOR Posted - 09 February 2006 14:32


Your question applies also to after the world was created, after the Torah was given, but the subsequent events that are described in the Torah did not yet take place.

Did Moshe get a Torah that said Moshe got punished for hitting the stone? If so, then why did he do it?

The answer to both questions is that the Torah is made up of names of


LiLIsraeli Posted - 14 March 2006 15:28


Awww, Moderator! I got so excited that you finally answered my post and I don't even get a real answer! Please post the rest as soon as possible.

Oh - just a point about the tiny little response that I did get:

"Did Moshe get a Torah that said Moshe got punished for hitting the stone? If so, then why did he do it?"

That's not my question. My point was that the Torah MUST be true, because the Torah is truth. So if Moshe got the Torah which said that he hit the stone and got punished for it, how could he NOT do it? Doesn't that negate his Bechirah?

His actions and their consequences were already predicted from before the world was created.


MODERATOR Posted - 03 April 2006 9:06


Sorry. Something obviously went wrong with my post.

Both the GRA and the Baal Shem Tov answer this Q saying that the Torah is, in its "pnimiyus", comprised of different Names of Hashem and combinations thereof.

That’s what Moshe got on Har Sinai. As the events unfolded, the names formed simple Hebrew words, but had different events occurred, the words would have been formed differently.

So even though the Torah was written before the world, the "external" combination of the letters and words happened as the events transpired.